This one has been a while coming - I started writing this almost a year ago. We lived through the craziness of the 2008 US Presidential election, returning to Oz just before the election. I followed the whole thing with a keen interest and we even managed to
see Obama give a speech.
Most Australians have a pretty low opinion of the whole process, so I thought I'd run through some things I learnt and try to give both perspectives.
AUS: The whole process of having primaries is flawed (
especially caucuses), unfairly favours the early states, "Democratic" nominations can be overturned by
super delegates, and effectively means you have two elections. Why not just let each party internally decide who they think their best candidate is? It would cut a big chunk of time off the 2-year process.
US: Because the process is so stage-managed and every position carefully polled, it needs to go on long enough that Americans can glimpse some reality through the campaign armour. The state order thing is stupid, but we are
trying to fix it. If we get it wrong, campaigns will cost even more money.
AUS: The process requires
so much money that only multi-millionaires can be president. Is that democratic?
US: Yeah, it sucks.
AUS: Why do
newspapers endorse candidates? Doesn't that kind of go against the impartiality ethic? Seems wrong, but I think I like it.
US: I guess the editors are expressing their opinions as private citizens.
AUS: How will ex-criminals who have done their time ever feel like part of society if in lots of states
they are permanently barred from voting? What is wrong with letting everyone vote regardless of whether they have been in, or are currently in, prison? Is it because they are most likely to be poor and African-American, and therefore vote democrat?
US: We're supposed to be punishing criminals: those who break the rules don't get a say in the making of the rules. What if all criminals voted for an anarchist?
AUS: In the elections of 1876, 1888, and 2000, the candidate who won the nationwide popular vote did not become President. Buh? The electoral college system seems to have created a really expensive way to end up with the wrong rich dude.
US: Read the
wikipedia article. There are some good reasons for it. Really.
AUS: Why is voting optional? This seems to give the media and pollsters too much power: "CNN says Obama is going to win, so I don't need to go vote". Americans (actually, most people in most countries) love complaining about the government, but Americans don't even bother choosing who they will complain about for the next few years.
US: Why would you want people who don't care voting in the election?
AUS: Why the gap between the election and inauguration? You picked a guy, why not let them do the job?
US: Hey, the gap
used to be 4 months, be grateful for small mercies.
